Chancellor Schröder's struggle against
USrael's plans for world domination

Bush's war aim against Iraq isn't about disarming the Iraqi forces, it is about achieving world domination. And the German Chancellor's attempt to prevent this war, is not for the sake of peace, but to prevent an America world hegemony!

The following article depicts a scenario that could, perhaps, become reality sooner than strategists anticipate. It describes the possibility of Germany's disassociation from America and the foundation of an axis PARIS-BERLIN-MOSCOW. Much of this will depend upon whether France and Russia keep their word, given to Chancellor Schröder, or whether, at the hour of truth, both submit themselves once more to America's will. America already pursues the impeachment of the German Chancellor through a vote of no confidence in parliament, to be initiated by Germany's USrael-Party (CDU/CSU): "America perceives in a rebellious Europe, a specimen of the Schröder-Germany, a peril. ... Washington wishes to see a change of regime in Berlin. Because Schröder won the election by an anti-American campaign, is therefore unacceptable for America that Schröder remains in office. Thus, Schröder must be humiliated 'to warn others of such an example'." -- Die Zeit 8/2003. The coming weeks will clarify which direction Europe will take. Should France and Russia uphold their line of politics against America, the world is going to change dramatically within the next few months.

"Germans think Bush is more dangerous than Saddam"

"Every second German sees in US President George W. Bush a peril to world peace."

Spiegel online - Feb 14, 2003

"The Nato-Crisis is not caused by the three veto states, France, Germany and Belgium, but by warmonger, US President George W. Bush."

'Tagesanzeiger Zürich' quoted by DIE ZEIT, 08/2003

USrael is on the point of snatching the remainder of the world's oil reserves under its control and to deploy huge military forces against other "rogue states" like Iran and Syria who are next on America's hit list. It is USrael's aim to attempt to control the world for which it needs total control over the world's energy reserves. As soon as Bush starts bombing Iraq, Israel might take the opportunity to evict the Palestinians from what is left of their country, in order to secure the region's water reserves for the Jewish state.

The political and tactical maneuvers by the German Chancellor are the attempt to cut across USraels world-domination plans: "The Chancellor versus Superpower USA: Interrupted by tumultuous applause, Schröder referred in a twenty minute speech before the party's faction to a 'historical decision for Germany'. ... Soon it would be decided whether 'the world will remain multipolar' or whether important decisions will be made by only one pole - in Washington." (Die Welt, Feb 12, 2003) Ex-Chancellor Helmut Kohl's advisor, Michael Stürmer, judges Schröder's politics in a similar way: "It is not about Iraq, it is about Germany." -- Die Welt, Feb 13, 2003, p. 3.

Until very recently no one would have believed that a German Chancellor could dare to engage himself in such politics. Especially when he belongs to these "unpatriotic socialists". Whilst Herr Schröder, the socialist, develops a profile of statesmanship, the opposition (CDU/CSU, Christian Democrats) plea to keep Germany's vassal status untouched and to willingly support Bush's war. In response, Chancellor Schröder referred to these "Christian" vassals in his speech before parliament on February 13, 2003 as "warmongers". Everything seems to be upside-down. WELT columnist, Michael Möller, called it "tectonic shifting" in the political landscape of Germany", to be observed by the following new trend: "Leftists suddenly seize hold of subjects such as the eviction of Germans from their lands, or the bombing of German cities. This coincides with conspicuous emancipation gestures of Socialist/Green politics, which reminds one of nationalistic traditions." -- Die Welt, Feb 8, 2003, p. 8.

Herr Schröder submitted himself to USrael's pressure obviously only as long as he didn't believe he could resist. But he was never a convinced vassal, as the leaders of the Christian Democrats (CDU/CSU). Schröder's "German-Way-Strategy" could already been observed when he introduced his politics on September 20, 1999 before the "German Society for Foreign Relations" in Berlin. "16 pages of typescript [of his speech] did not mention America once." -- Die Welt, Feb 13, 2003, p. 3.

The German Chancellor knows about America's desperate situation. He is aware that this country has been, financially and economically, ravaged by Globalists. The US does not generate sufficient and competitive industrial goods any longer to overcome Europe's competition in the world markets. Therefore the Bush-Administration endeavours to bring the Globe under its military control and to impose USrael's Dollar hegemony on a global world. If the Dollar did not have to face the Euro as a competitive world currency, America was still in a position to continue to live like a parasite from the Dollar-Tribute of the rest of the world. Therefore America must make sure the oil of the Middle East is under her control, thus it is sold in Dollars, not in Euros. The Schröder-Government now obviously believes, the time to resist America was favourable and that resistance needed be launched before the world has been totally brought under America's control by the super power's enormous weaponry of mass destruction. It is true, America has become vulnerable because of her internal desperate condition: "America's impotence encourages revolts against the world power. ... In 1949 America was strong enough to protect the Europeans against the old demons. Today, the only remaining super power is neither capable nor willing." -- Die Welt, Feb 13, 2003, p. 3) 

Whilst Schröder strives to snatch Germany from the clutches of American occupational power, the opposition leaders, Herr Stoiber and Frau Merkel, insist on maintaining the German underling status: "Germany did not come into being as a state in quest of a foreign policy, but was the result of American foreign policies in quest of a state." -- Die Welt, Feb 13, 2003, p. 3. Unlike the Christian Democrats, Ministers of Mr. Schröder's Socialist Party increasingly insist that "Germany is not America's vassal." -- Defence Minister, Peter Struck, "Berlin Mitte", ZDF, German TV, Feb 13, 2003.

Human-Rights-Watch-Director Kenneth Roth said in DIE WELT, Feb 17,2003, p. 6

"This is will not be a war for the well being of the Iraqi people. ... This war has other motives."

Germany's team mates in the "great game" to prevent American world domination, Russia and France, have more or less identical interests in pursuing this politics. Russia's goals are quite obvious. President Putin first curtailed Jewish influence in politics, economy and the media in his country and he now tries to prevent his country being surrounded by USrael's armed forces under the guise of Nato. All alarm bells sounded in the Kremlin when Poland advanced as America's favourite ally and especially when it is to become, America's preferred military deployment range: "Washington's new favourite ally Poland is now staking its interest on the American card." -- Die Welt, Feb 7, 2003. Whilst Russia has a vital interest in bringing American dominated Nato to a point of collapse, the U.S. preparing actions against Germany:  "However, America has stopped all building work on and investment in its 21 major bases and numerous smaller outposts in Germany as it reconsiders pulling out to a 'friendlier' county [Poland] in Europe." (Daily Mail, Feb 11, 2003, p. 4) Has the surrounding of Germany began again, as it did 1939?

With whom would Putin most like to work with in the shaping of Europe's political future. With America or with Germany? This was expressed quite frankly during his speech before the German "Reichstag" on September 25, 2001: "Russia and America are separated by oceans, between Russia and Germany, there is our great history." Putin's strategic politics are obviously so open "that the Russian media already talk of a 'new entente' with Germany." -- Die Welt, Feb 14, 2003, p. 2)

France has never integrated its armed forces under Nato-Command, because it always perceived that the alliance, lead by America, was a great offence to a proudly independent nation. Since the alliance was founded, France understood the potential danger for its own sovereignty and that of Europe. French politics always sought for to end American occupation in Europe. Since America imposed its power on Europe through military and monetary hegemony, France worked steadily over many years to set up a rival world currency and is working on an independent European defence force. France, it seems, believes the time for a treaty with Germany and some other countries has come: "By closing ranks with Germany, France's idea, to create a counterbalance against Nato through a European defence and security policy, got a new boost." -- Die Welt, Feb 14, 2003.

A Europe that is merging and emancipating itself from USrael has always been perceived as a peril to America's hegemony. Eugene V. Rostow held the position of Dean of the Yale Law School, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs, Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, and Chairman of the Committee on the Present Danger. Rostow, a high caliber political strategist, didn't beat about the bush when he explained why America waged two world wars in Europe: "America fought two wars to prevent the unification of Europe under German control." (Plain Truth, Sep 1987 edition, p. 25)

The Farce of the year

Iraq is mapped out for destruction, women, children and men will die in a horrible firestorm, in order that USrael's democracy can be brought to this country. Some European leaders demand the democratization of Iraq at a time when they brush aside the will 90 of their people who reject such a war. In the US about 70 percent condemn Bush's war against Iraq. These war-democrats of the West hold the wishes of their people brazenly in contempt. Moreover, Jewish General Franks of the US-Army is suppose to govern Iraq in the next few years by a military regime. Besides masses of bombs, rockets and death, this broken nation will be so fortunate to receive the added blessing of an American military dictatorship as a signpost of the New World Order à la USrael.

America sees in Europe's own currency and by its noticeable emancipation, in process, a menace to its plans for world domination: "A single-currency of Europe poses a challenge to U.S. commercial dominance in the world." (CNN, Internet, Sep. 1998)

It is a fact, America only used Nato as a military lever to keep Germany down. General William Odom, graduated from West Point, holding a Ph.D. from Columbia, worked in two presidential administrations. Carter's National Security Council and in Reagan's administration as the Army's chief of staff for intelligence and the director of the National Security Agency. In JOHN MCLAUGHLIN'S famous TV-show "ONE ON ONE", broadcasted in the US on April 24/25, 1999, General Odom said: "NATO was created, not as most people think to defend against the Soviet military threat. They wanted NATO to deal with the German question. The British wanted NATO to keep the U.S. in Europe. And the expansion of NATO is for the same reason: the German question. ... You are richer today because of it. We've been in Korea and Japan and Germany forever, and It's paid ... If you look back and see what's happened over the years, we've gotten richer and richer and richer."

After the introduction of the Euro, the American Dollar-Hegemony in Europe and around the world started to sway. Large flows of money were invested into the Euro instead of the Dollar. The financially and economically hollowed out America, requires a daily injection of about two billion Dollars from abroad, just to keep afloat, which without this infusion of foreign cash, America will no longer be able to deflect a competitive world currency in the global market. Although America has compiled the largest arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in her history, she is rapidly losing respect from her "friends" and "allies" due to the country's catastrophic monetary situation. When America's exemplar vassal, Germany, not only openly refuses loyalty, at least for a time, but also undermines America's power tool Nato, then we see the signs of decay of a global empire on the horizon of world history.

It was America's great loss of status, that can never be made up again, when France, Belgium and Germany vetoed Nato's plans to support Turkey in the war against Iraq. The catastrophe took shape when Washington initially demanded from the Alliance, military support for Turkey, when war against Iraq had become imminent. This request was then rejected by reasoning that Nato was not at war with Iraq. Bush took the blow and made Turkey demand military support according paragraph 4, Nato-Treaty, which was then vetoed by France, Germany and Belgium once again. The fact that Germany, America's first vassal, pulled a tooth out of America's military tiger, would have been inconceivable even a few weeks ago. Bush's mouthpiece, Secretary of State Colin Powell, subsequently stated: "'The Alliance is breaking apart if the responsibilities are not taken up'. Powell hopes that Nato will 'in the next 24 hours do the right thing'. ... Powell's 24-hour-ultimatim runs out by Thursday night. ... The foreign minister's harsh words had no direct effect." -- Die Welt, Feb 13, 2003, p. 6.

 

"Four years ago, the former French Foreign Minister, Hubert Vedrine, described the U.S. as a 'hyper power' and said that such a force could not be accepted. ...

Daily Mail, Feb 21, 2003, p. 14

A decline of America, similar to the collapse of the Soviet Union, is possible. Signs of disintegration are already visible. Whilst Washington attempts to win its ex and new vassals for its war against Iraq in order to exploit the country's oilfields, a first American State came forward and opposed Bush's war plans: "The State of Maine votes against an Iraq-War." -- Die Welt, Feb 13, 2003, p. 7.

The Bush-Administration has tried by various means to split apart its competitor Europe and to isolate Germany, in order to bring the Euro to a collapse: "To damage Germany's economy is the real aim, Pentagon planning officials say. ... 'Trade agreements will be terminated' another Pentagon official was quoted by the 'Observer'." -- Die Welt, Feb 20, 2003, p. 6.

Moreover, every war is an asset for America's financial institutions. As soon economies go slow due to war pressures, they need to borrow more and more fresh money. By waging a war against Iraq, Washington is going to kill two birds with one stone. Firstly, European countries will have to sign up for higher loans and secondly, higher debts force them to weaken their stabilization criteria for the Euro: "The Iraq-Conflict worsens the world wide economic crisis. After Great Britain, France and America increasing their national debts, now is Germany's turn: The Chancellor wants to stop the decline by increasing the state's debts." -- Der Spiegel, 8/2003, p. 68. The lending strategy of the global players is as old as the Bible: "You [Jews] will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. You will rule over many nations but none will rule over you." -- Deuteronomy 15:6.

Poland, not yet even a ratified member of the EU, didn't waste any time in siding with America against Germany and France. The same applies to the Czech Republic and Hungary. Even some of the older EU-members, that were always lavished with financial good turns, like Spain, Great Britain and Italy, turned against Germany alongside America. Europe is strife-torn and Germany might soon be surrounded as in 1938. It was a very crucial move when USrael imposed the admission of money hungry countries into the EU on Germany. Amongst them Turkey with an inflation rate of 70 percent. A EU, consisting of such members would be a bankrupt community of states and would pose no more threat to America than perhaps Luxemburg alone. A busted European Union can never be the foundation of a world currency (Euro), thus the Dollar would re-conquer its monetary supremacy in the world. Only such a Europe seems to be tolerated by USrael. But such a Europe also means, Germany, the financier, will be kept in bondage forever, as under a Super-Versailles-Dictate.

This fatal development couldn't possibly remain unnoticed by Schröder and Chirac, especially when France always opposed the admission of eastern countries like Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary etc. France wanted to form a small but strong European Union. The EUs extension to the east has always been a thorn in the flesh of French politics. By helping the German Chancellor out of the trap of isolation, imposed on him, when he rejected loyalty to America, he forced Berlin onto the French track: "Because of Schröder's dependence on Chirac's goodwill ... Paris can hope that the EU will in future become a stronger instrument for French interests and ideas." -- Die Welt, Feb 14, 2003.

Germany also indicated that America's wish to create a bankrupt Europe through the admission of those have-nots states, meant eternal dependence on America. Therefore Josef Fischer, the German Foreign Minister, referred already a few years ago to a so-called Core-Europe, which was totally dismissed by Washington: "A self-confident Core-Europe that groups around a German-French centre, posed in the eyes of America's neo-conservative leadership a threat to American Interests." -- DIE ZEIT 08/2003

"Americans are very voracious"

"The late president Fran-cois Mitterrand put it this way to his. biographer: 'We are at war with America. Yes, a perma-nent war, a vital war... They are very hard, the Americans, they are very voracious; they want undivided power over the world'."

Daily Mail, London, Feb 21, 2003, p. 14

The current European Union, deployed by America against Germany, will be unable to survive financially and politically. The enormous monies, Germany has to come up with for its new EU-members, will be instantly redirected to America. In other words, the EU (foremost Germany) finances through its Budget USrael's financial needs: "When Poland will officially become a member-state of the EU by May 1, 2004 she will receive from Brussels 4.7 billion Euro to start with. In the following years Poland will get additional aide for its farmers and infrastructure. Altogether Poland shall obtain up to 2006 more than 16 billion Euros, raised by the taxpayers of Old-Europe, foremost being the Germans. Such a generous contribution to its budget has enabled Warsaw to order new fighter jets for 3.8 billion Euros. But Poland's arm-order did not go to her partners and supporters from the EU. The Poles bought 48 fighter jets (F-16) from America's Lockheed-Martin-Group, although France, Great Britain and Sweden intervened against the deal. George W. Bush committed himself in re-directing Poland's order to America. ... According to a report from the Solana-Staff, America uses the EU candidates from the Eastern countries in order to obstruct EUs foreign and security policies from gaining strength." -- Der Spiegel 8/2003, p. 33.

The motive, to abolish an American directed EU and to create a Core-Europe instead, is more than understandable. The attempt to create a new German-French policy must be seen in relation to such a scenario: "France sees the EU-expansion jeopardized. ... France warned all Eastern-European EU-candidates, that their admission as a member, could be endangered if they were supporting America's war against Iraq. ... President Chirac stated, these EU-candidates had 'not behaved in a responsible and well mannered way'. ... Those candidates had missed the opportunity, 'to shut up', said Chirac." -- Süddeutsche Zeitung, Feb 19, 2003. The current EU, America's preferred version, could indeed end. The contempt,  French Defence Minister, Mrs. Michèle Alliot-Marie, showed during her visit to Warsaw on Feb 18, 2003 towards the Polish Foreign Minister, by words and looks, spoke volumes. The way she dressed him down like a school boy before the world's media, doesn't leave much leeway for a continuation of the old EU. The future of Israel's Fifth Column inside the EU, might be over, even before it has begun.

Following the openly demonstrated treason by the "Bush-Willings" (Denmark, Great Britain, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Hungary and Czech Republic), neither Schröder nor Chirac can be interested in keeping the old, America designed EU, alive through Germany's money infusion. Closing ranks between France and Germany became compelling after USrael openly started to split up the old European Union: "Bush splits up Europe. Europe falls into two camps: US-President George W. Bush succeeded by a diplomatic offensive to prevent a unified anti-war coalition on the other side of the Atlantic." -- Spiegel online, Jan 30, 2003.

It appears that in the shadow of America's war endeavours, the attempt was made, to cut across America's EU-plans and to undermine Nato, America's occupation tool. At the same time it is aimed to built a strong Core-Europe by also closing ranks with Russia: "Chancellor Schröder conducts world politics quite vigorously and not always very diplomatically. He challenges America and forges with Russia and France an axis of the unwilling. According to the inspectors' report [about Iraq] of last Friday there was one person standing very much alone: George W. Bush." -- Der Spiegel, 8/2003, p. 20. It was the first independent action in the great theatre of world politics by a German government since Adolf Hitler.

Schröder's struggle

"Revolt against America. David Schröder against Goliath Bush." stern 9/2003, influential German weekly magazine

Schröder and Chirac realise in the light of the recent EU-Treason by the "eight" that these EU-member candidates work as an American coalition inside the EU, and therefore must be denied access to the German money source. A Core-Europe with an axis PARIS-BERLIN-MOSCOW could therefore become America's real nightmare. Only the theoretical insinuation of an axis BERLIN-MOSCOW already caused much concern in Washington a few years ago: "So whatever Clinton hoped for history's legacy from his last summit in Russia, he was facing a German-speaking Mr. Clean with his eyes on a post-Clinton future." (Los Angeles Times, Jun 4,.2000)

The trial run for an axis PARIS-BERLIN-MOSCOW was now being launched when resisting America's Iraq war. Gerhard Schröder is the first Chancellor in postwar Germany to pursue German interests in the arena of world politics instead of nodding to allied plans. Such a stance came as a surprise to the victors and therefore comments in the British-American media were quite plain:   "As France and Germany threaten to wreck Nato, fury in the U.S. ... All of us should feel utter contempt for the shameful behaviour and despicable ingratitude of our so-called allies France and Germany." (Daily Mail, London, Feb 11, 2003, pages 1,2)

Should France and Russia really have the courage to stay on the side of Germany and veto a second war resolution against Iraq, the birth of an axis PARIS-BERLIN-MOSCOW could be considered viable. The end of the currently controlled United Nations, Nato and EU could then be imminent. At the same time Germany could regain its sovereignty. Is this impossible? Perhaps at this time. However, Alexander Rahr, WELT-Columnist, referred to such a scenario as a conceivable one "Are we witnessing the beginning of an era when parts of Europe are setting for a new course, emancipated from America? In six months time other Western-European countries like Italy, Spain or Greece, who have a strong political left wing and strong leftists unions, could, under public pressure, follow the example of Schröder and Chirac. They might then leave the anti-terror-alliance, in order not to be dragged on the side of America into a threatening war against the Islamic world. The thought, to position the EU as a counterbalance against America in the world, would surely not be implemented now and not because of Saddam. In case America continues to hold the UN in contempt or to use them as an American tool, this idea could, however, then be taken up by some European countries." -- Die Welt, Feb 15, 2003)