The European Union Commission's Proposed 'Anti-Racist" Law

September 11th events used as 'Reichstag Fire' pretext for imposing a Zionist-inspired "anti-racist' Enabling Act

A horrendous but official European Union Commission document constitutes a formal proposal from the Commission of the European Union to create a Europe-wide network of "legal" repression in which any kind of "racism" or "xenophobia" (as yet undefined in UK law) will become punishable with minimum two-year jail terms.

This law, will not be put before, debated by and voted for by the British Parliament. If it is accepted by the EU Council of Ministers it will become law in all the member nations of the European Community without further ado.

"Crimes" which are not (as yet!) designated as crimes in country "A" can be prosecuted in country "B" where they are so designated. Country "A" will have to surrender its citizens to an extradition arrest-warrant issued by country "B" without having to pass any test in country "A" 's courts that a prima facie case exists to justify such an extradition.

It is the stated intention of the law that the "anti-racist" laws of all EU member nations must be brought into line with the laws of the country with the most severe sanctions against "racist and xenophobic crime" - which probably means Germany, whose body of law on this subject are the product of the "de-Nazification" process and are especially oppressive. Germany has a legal tradition with regard to civil rights (established long before the National Socialist era, but still cherished) which can be summed up as follows:

"Anything which is not specifically permitted is FORBIDDEN!"

This, of course, is completely contrary to the English tradition which has it that "Anything which is not specifically forbodden in permitted".

Here is one example of how the proposed new EU law would work:

If you had a web site which contained any "revisionist", "racist" or "xenophobic" material, even though such material may not be illegal in the country where you reside (say Britain) but illegal in other EU countries (say Germany or France), then the German or French authorities could force the British authorities to facilitate your extradition to Germany or France where you would be held and tried under German or French law and procedures.

Some Euro countries are notorious for taking several years to bring defendants to trial, especially those who will not readily confess their "guilt"! A current example of this is the Greek government's detention of a group of British and Dutch "plane spotter" tourists on a charge of "espionage" in the most squalid jail conditions.

The fact that you based your web site with an ISP outside the EU (say the United States, in which the First Amendment to the Constitution protects free speech) would be no defence under this EU law, which has as its motto with regard to "Internet crime": "If it's illegal offline, then it's illegal on-line!"

A private individual convicted of sending a "criminal" e-mail to a discussion group would have his computer confiscated as part of his/her punishment. All these sanctions would be accompanied by minimum jail terms of two years.

Here is another example:

If a " racist crime" was perpetrated by means of a commercial enterprise (e.g. a printing business producing leaflets, booklets, periodicals or other "criminal" literature) then the business would be put into compulsory liquidation (regardless of how commercially sound it was) and all its equipment would be auctioned-off and the proceeds confiscated.

The above examples constitutes only a taste of the horrors of this proposed Euro-legislation. Every re-reading reveals further views of Hell.

Similar complementary draconian laws are being enacted currently by the British Government ("to meet the challenge of the September 11th terrorist emergency") and also, I understand, in the United States.

In Britain, the anti-terrorist law currently before Parliament includes a provision to outlaw "incitement to religious hatred" much along the lines of the existing law against incitement to racial hatred.. This is being justified as a measure to "reassure and protect" the burgeoning Muslim population in the UK and to demonstrate to Muslim countries who have joined the "international alliance against terrorism" that the campaign is only against terrorism, not against Islam. This, of course, is a temporary propaganda expedient.

The real reason why this measure against incitement to religious hatred is being sneaked through along with "anti terrorist" measures is because the Board of Deputies of British Jews have been lobbying for such a law for decades - especially during the past few years when light has been shed on the putrescent anti-Gentile ravings ("hatred" does not cover the matter) contained within 'The Talmud'. Zionist-Jewry is desperate to stifle the widespread dissemination of its core beliefs.

All these EU and UK proposals were urged upon the EU Commission and the UK government (then Tory) about eight years ago by various Zionist-Jewish organisations such as the Board of Deputies of British Jews, the B'nai B'rith/ Anti-Defamation League and the Weisenthal Centre. The proposals were not on the whole accepted because they were seen as being seen as too radical and repressive. Now the whole tyrannous package (with a few extra brass knobs on!) is being whizzed through under cover of the "war against terrorism".

The fact that such a vast and complicated document was drawn up and put on the agenda of the next meeting of the EU Council of Ministers is a sure indication that the measure was not hastily compiled to meet an unforseen emergency.

In short, International Zionist Jewry and its allies are using the September 11th incidents as a pretext to impose laws outlawing all opposition to all of the following: Israel, Zionism, the Jewish demand for a unique right to exercise ethnic exclusivity, the orthodox view of WW2, mass migrations, race mixing and the entire globalist vision.

This oppression is being foisted on Britain, Europe, America and the entire world in much the same way that the Nazis were supposed to have used the Reichstag Fire as the pretext for stampeding into law the Hitler's "Enabling Act" which prohibited all political opposition.