All Germans Can Wholeheartedly Approve of This English Victory Over This Germany"

Translated from the German section of the National Journal (NJ staff article in German)
by "zijp@usa.net", 22 November 2008

The genocidal bombing campaigns against the civilian population of Germany during World War II, conducted by the greatest war criminal of all time, Winston Churchill, will forever be a black mark against noble Albion.

However, the victory of England in the Toben-Battle over the BRD (Bundesrepublik Deutschland = Federal Republic of Germany) in the War for Human Rights will eternally resound to its glory.

The impeccable independent scientist and researcher, Dr. Frederick Töben, escaped the clutches of "Thought-Crime-Beria" - thanks to noble British judges.

The National Journal has already posted several articles on the arrest of Dr. Frederick Töben, the renowned, independent researcher of "Holocaust," at London's Heathrow Airport on 1 October 2008. The arrest took place at the behest of “democratic” Germany.

"Democratic" Germany wanted to incarcerate this impeccable scientist in its political gulag, as it has done with countless other modern day Giordano Brunos in recent years.

Engendered in the toxic slime of Allied war-lies and atrocity propaganda, the BRD has obligated itself to brutally enforce the monstrous Allied propaganda forever, long after the unconditional surrender of the Wehrmacht, in violation of the most elemental human rights. This slavish mission of BRD is in fact its raison d'etre.

Andreas Grossmann, the head prosecutor of Mannheim District Court, functions as a kind of Beria* for the BRD "Thought Police".

Immediately after Dr. Töben's arrest, Grossmann boasted before the international press that England would be forced to bow to BRD's demand for extradition and deliver the innocent scientist to his clutches. "Andreas Grossmann, the Mannheim district prosecutor handling Dr Toben's case, said that despite his attempts to avoid extradition from Britain to Germany, he expected Dr Toben to be on trial early next year. Mr Grossmann also warned that Dr Toben faced up to five years in jail and, although most prisoners in Germany served a third to a half of their sentences, the stubborn refusal of long-term Holocaust revisionists to recant their views meant they usually failed to win parole. 'These people have little chance of getting out before the end of their full sentence', Mr Grossman told The Weekend Australian." (theaustralian.news.com.au, 11.10.2008)

However, England dashed the political ambitions of the world's would-be tyrant Grossmann with a very effective legal strategy.

First, District Court Judge Daphne Wickham ruled on 29 October 2008 that the Court would not comply with the BRD extradition request because of its vagueness and its lack of a legal basis. This had a high-explosive bomb effect under the very foundations of the BRD's fortress of lies.

Still, "democratic" Germany did not give up easily.

It instructed its English attorney, Ms Melanie Cumberland, to appeal Judge Wickham's decision. After that, the legal path to the highest court would have led through the English House of Lords.

Following Judge Wickham's ruling, it was extremely unlikely that the House of Lords in England would accede to the notorious BRD in its flagrant violation of human rights. Thus, Germany was made understood through Dr. Töben's solicitor, Kevin Lowry-Mullins, that a decision by the House of Lords could cause lasting damage to the BRD’s political system.

According to "Times Online", issue of 20 November 2008, Mr Lowry-Mullins made the following statement to the press:
“I said, ‘We will go all the way to the House of Lords with this and let the House of Lords decide’. But when the draft extradition act passed through the House of Lords in 2002, one of the questions was what would happen if someone was arrested on a European arrest warrant to be extradited to a country where Holocaust denial is an offence. The response was, ‘No, that will never happen’.”

England's refusal to extradite was a great blow to Germany's persecution machinery. It entailed the direct threat of being exposed for its flagrant crimes against humanity if the case was to go all the way to the House of Lords.

If the House of Lords had been forced to decide on the extradition request, BRD would have been officially exposed as a systematic violator of the human rights guaranteed under the United Nations' Charter. Thus, Germany was forced to withdraw its thought police from the front lines. Berlin instructed the humiliated "Beria of Opinion" to give up his extradition request.

Times Online of 20 November 2008 went on to report:
“The German Government has backed down from its fight to extradite the Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben from Britain, it emerged today. … German prosecutors were forced to appeal to the High Court after Britain refused to hand him over. Dr Toben’s solicitor, Kevin Lowry-Mullins, confirmed today that the appeal had been withdrawn and that he had signed a consent order with the German Government to end the case.”

The rebuff inflicted by Great Britain on the land of persecution in its efforts to suppress empirical truth, clearly hinders its attempt to extend the suppression of human rights throughout the European Union.

Against the background of the collapse of the global finance system and the death throes of EU, for which the BRD is sure to be blamed, Great Britain does not want to be associated with BRD's overzealous hunt for holocaust critics. This scenario was certainly part of England's calculations in its decision to immediately release Dr. Töben and force Berlin to abandon its attempts for Dr Töben's extradition.

An additional consideration was that elsewhere in Europe, the public is aware that sooner or later, Germany’s peculiar tenet of history is going to be abolished by Russia. What country still wants, in spite of this, to unnecessarily expose itself as a violator of human rights on account of Germany's despotic policies and laws?

Spain's abrogation of the "Holocaust Questioning Law" also took place against this background.

Even the strategically positioned Jews have begun to abandon the land of persecution and its official "Holocaust" cult. Since the legend will no longer be useful after the inevitable disintegration of Israel, they intend to put the blame for the crass violations of human rights on their BRD vassals. We look forward to that with great anticipation.

Those who consider this development unlikely should study the following passages from London's Jewish Chronicle dated 30 October 2008. The Jewish Chronicle is one of the world's leading Jewish news weeklies, supported by the most highly placed Jewish powerbrokers. The following passages were taken from an article that appeared just a few weeks before the BRD's defeat by Great Britain. Perhaps it was this very article that signalled Germany to lay down her arms in the battle over Dr Frederick Töben.

The headlines in the Jewish Chronicle article, that clearly demanded that Töben must not be handed over to Germany, read "Denial is not a criminal matter" and "Legislating against deniers of the Holocaust is part of a dangerous trend."

In the course of this article, the prominent Jewish columnist Geoffrey Alderman presents the reasoning that we can expect in the future:

"The British police arrested Dr. Töben because the German government had alleged that he had published materials trivializing the 'Holocaust.' "A spokesperson for the [Jewish] Community Security Trust was quoted as having praised the action of the British authorities in executing the EU warrant and as having expressed the hope 'that the German law will take its course'. I hope that nothing of the kind befalls Mr Toben. I hope that the extradition warrant is quashed, so that Mr Toben is once again free to roam the world denying the Holocaust to his heart's content. I also hope that not only will this kind of incident never happen again in this country, but that the British government will demand that German (and Austrian) laws criminalising Holocaust-denial are repealed at the earliest possible moment. But my worries about the Toben case go much deeper. My worries have to do with the alarming tendency of nation-states to criminalise the past "

Alderman then makes it increasingly clear who should be blamed at the termination of the disastrous crimes against humanity, called "Holocaust denial", by pointing his finger to the lying political henchmen who organised the most sinister persecution machinery in the history of mankind:
"This wretched proposal now under consideration by the European Union, to compel EU member states to enforce particular interpretations of history under the guise of ‘combating racism and xenophobia’. This proposal emanates (surprise, surprise!) from the German government …"

On one hand, it is true that the Jewish power centers have exaggerated and overplayed their hand, as they have done so often in their history. On the other hand, they allowed themselves to be drawn deeper and further into the swamp of government-protected lies by their BRD flunkeys, who were desperately trying to conceal their own crimes against the German nation by using Adolf Hitler as punch bag.

One consequence of this has been the flood of multiculturalism or "diversity" that is destroying Jewish supremacy in Europe.

With the end of Israel in view, the Jewish power centers are asking: will the Jewish Holocaust against the Palestinians be avenged in the multicultural Europe of the future? If the holocaust laws now demanded by Germany for the entire EU were enacted, would the Jews in future be inviting prosecution by merely attempting to defend themselves against charges of genocide in Palestine? This would then constitute the crime of "denying the Palestinian Holocaust".

At any rate, columnist Alderman of the Jewish Chronicle is gravely concerned about this possibility:

"Ask yourself how such a mad law might be enforced, and with what result. … Suppose I declare that the killing of Palestinians at Deir Yassin in 1948 did not actually amount to a war crime. If the EU proposal were implemented, would I face imprisonment, just because I had exercised my professional judgment in a way that upset Arab propagandists? Let's assume that I stated publicly that the massacre of Palestinians in Deir Yassin in 1948 was not really a war atrocity. If the EU proposal relating to criminalized interpretations of history were enacted, would I expect to be imprisoned in case the Arabs felt injured by my opinions?"

Certain twits in the higher echelons of Holocaust-Germany still do not realise that the epoch in which they could forcefully suppress reason, knowledge and free research is coming to an end. Power relationships are wavering and are certain to change drastically in the near future. Judaism is going to shrug off its old "Holocaust" interests like a lingering sickness. The day of reckoning will come with the representatives of evil -- that is, the responsible parties in Holocaust-Germany. At any rate, the Jewish Chronicle has defined how history will again be written in future:

"The task of the historian is to investigate, confront, challenge and, if necessary, correct society's collective memory. In this process, the state ought to have no role whatever, none at all. Certainly not in the UK, which delights in presenting itself as a bastion of academic freedom. Above all not in Great Britain, which has always prided itself in being a bastion of scientific freedom."

Thus, there is renewed hope for those of us who are informed and therefore persecuted: hope that responsible persons in BRD, the land of lies, whether politicians, judges, prosecutors or media hacks, will some day be unable to evade just punishment for their crimes against humanity.

*Lavrentiy Pavlovich Beria was the Jewish chief of the Soviet security and secret police apparatus under Stalin. He was top deputy of the NKVD during the Great Purge, responsible for many of the millions of imprisonments and killings.