National Journal, first published: 26/01/09

"Vodoh"-Revolution?

"Vatican's Open Debate on the Holocaust"

The Vatican deliberately avoided anything that could be interpreted as condemning Auxiliary Bishop Richard Williamson for publicly branding the holocaust story a lie and a huge exploitation of the German people.

When the Vatican departed from the Christian Gospel in 1965 as a result of the treacherous Concilium Vaticanum II, the Church of the Christian Redeemer was shock struck. As from then the Jewish agenda (John 8:43) was adopted as inspiration to the "Holy See". This led to the breakaway of a group of influential clergy men under the leadership of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre from the Roman Catholic Church. The SSPX (Society of Saint Pius X) was born.

The SSPX remained true to the Christian tenet and gained popularity around the world since. The spiritual leaders of the SSPX also knew that a church can't survive by conspiring with liars whilst the Vatican departed from the virtue of veracity. The Vatican since supported holocaust lies with verve.

The SSPX, in contrast, opposed the holocaust lie from the beginning. The true Christian Church did not want to be associated with the devil's agenda. Bishop Williamson, who was appointed by the founder of the SSPX, Archbishop Lefebvre, to pursue with his lifework, openly condemned the holocaust. Recently even in an interview with Swedish TV that caused uproar in the Jewish world. The interview was televised at a time when Benedict XVI was about to lift the ban of excommunication of the four SSPX-Bishops. World Jewry hoped the holocaust interview of Bishop Williamson would hinder the Pope to rehabilitate the revisionist clergy man.

However, this time the Pope did not bow to Jewish pressure and welcomed all four SSPX-Bishops back to the fold. Jewry screamed, yelled and threatened the Pope: "Shimon Samuels, of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre in Paris, said he understood the German-born pope's desire for Christian unity but said Benedict could have excluded Williamson, whose return to the church will 'cost' the Vatican politically." (Guardian, 25.01.09)

It is true the Pope could have easily excluded Bishop Williamson from being rehabilitated. But he flatly refused to comply. Whether Benedict acted under pressure from groups of influential Cardinals, or whether he cunningly wants to retaliate because Jewry libels the memory of Pope Pius XII as having aided and abetted the holocaust, remains unknown. Time will tell about the real motives and the divine forces behind the pope when rehabilitating Bishop Williamson.

The media hacks, sent out by the Jewish lobby, spitefully asked at the Vatican's press conference, why Bishop Williamson was welcomed back to the fold, despite of his "holocaust denial". What the world heard then, was never heard since the globe's soul had been crippled by false holocaust narrative. The Vatican's spokesman refrained self-confident from the demand to condemn Bishop Williamson. Instead, a stunned gang of hacks was told that the Bishop's holocaust lecture was "open to criticism". "Senior Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi fought back yesterday, telling the Observer: 'Williamson's statements are not agreed with and are open to criticism, and they have nothing to do with the lifting of the excommunication. One is not connected to the other. The Society of Saint Pius X has itself distanced itself from these statements'." (The Observer, Sunday 25 January 2009)

"Open to criticism" means "open to debate" the so-called holocaust. Are we witnessing the beginning of a "Vodoh"-Revolution? We now realise that the holocaust story is not going to "survive".