|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
National Journal: First published 01/01/2010 |
|
IS THERE A REVOLT AGAINST THE ISRAEL LOBBY BREWING IN BRITAIN? A review of Peter Oborne's TV report "Inside Britain's Israel Lobby" Some of you may have seen Peter Oborne's report Inside the Israel Lobby which was broadcast on Monday 16th November on Channel 4 TV. If you missed it, the film may be viewed by going to: [ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POtk6G7q4Bw ] . Unfortunately C4 have embedded a block against downloading. Contrary to my opinion expressed before this film was broadcast, Oborne's report was not a damp squib, but one in the eye for the Zionist-Jewish Lobby in the UK. The film produces much evidence to show that this lobby is clearly intent, by means of the deployment of bribery and intimidation, on subverting key personnel in Britain's body politic, public services and media so that they will act in the interests of Israel even when this is clearly not in the British national interest. Professor Kevin MacDonald , professor of Psychology at California State University-Long Beach, kindly invited me to produce a review of Oborne's film. This I did and it is now posted on his influential The Occidental Observer web site: <http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Webster-Oborne.html> . I give some information about Prof. MacDonald in due course. In my review I have attempted to cover not only what I felt were the key points in Oborne's report, but also to supplement his information with additional facts, some of which must have been known to him but which he felt unable to mention ether due to constraints of time or a desire to avoid accusations of "anti-semitism". (I put that word in quote marks because it is quite meaningless. The correct word is anti-Jewish.) I believe that my supplementary information goes to show that Zionist-Jewry in Britain (as elsewhere in the Diaspora) is mobilised to corrupt public servants to advance and show favouritism not just to the particular interests of Israel, but to Jewry in general, in all its locations and apparitions. Some of the information I present relates to the way in which the British National Party, under its leader Nick Griffin , has been cunningly induced, over the past ten years, to adopt its current posture: a pro-Israel populist party whose opposition to multi-racialism has been replaced by an anti-Islam placebo. But for the most part I devote most of my commentary to Zionist subversion and manipulation of Establishment figures and entities, not opportunist and rather flaky wannabees. The following extract from my review will serve to give an indication of the kind of information I deploy to supplement that used by Oborne: [Start extract] The Jewish Lobby is not only able to stage-manage question sessions involving relatively junior members of the government, it is able to set the agenda for the well-known weekly Prime Minister's Questions. In these time-limited sessions it is very hard for ordinary members to "catch the Speaker's eye" -- i.e.: be given the opportunity to put a question and thereby gain massive publicity for a topic. (The recently-appointed Speaker is John Bercow, a Jew co-opted to the ancient and prestigious post from the Tory benches, whose wife is a gentile Labour Party prospective parliamentary candidate. What's the betting he's a member of the Conservative Friends of Israel and she's a members of the Labour Friends of Israel?) During Prime Minister's Questions at the end of November -- too late for Oborne to include in his Dispatches report -- Tory leader David Cameron asked Prime Minister Brown about £130,000 of public funds said to have been made available to two Muslim schools run by the Shakhsiyah Foundation in Slough and Haringey which Cameron alleged had "links" to the "Islamic extremist" group Hizb-ut-Tahrir . Brown replied that he would investigate Cameron's concerns "very, very carefully". The obvious purpose of the question was to suggest that the current Labour administration was soft on "Islamic extremists" (sub-text: "terrorists"!). But another unstated item on the Jewish agenda was at work as well, namely: Why was the government making grants to militant Islamic schools while the Jewish Free School (JFS) is shortly to appear at the Supreme Court to appeal against a High Court ruling that the school's admissions policy is "discriminatory on the grounds of race or ethnic origin" and, hence, illegal under the Race Relations Act? JEWRY CONTESTS RACE ACT LITIGATION -- THE BNP DOES NOT Background: The JFS refused to admit a boy whose father is Jewish according to the Orthodox interpretation of the Halacha , but whose mother was born a gentile but who converted to Judaism via the Liberal-Reform route. Liberal-Reform conversions are not recognised as valid by the majority United Synagogue congregation, from among whose rabbinate the Chief Rabbi of the UK is always appointed. (Liberal-Reform conversions are likewise not recognised by the Orthodox rabbinical authorities in Israel who adjudicate on claims for citizenship under the Law of The Return). I understand that the litigation against the JFS, though launched by the boy's parents is -- or eventually became -- "legally-aided", that is, supported by grants of public funds via the Legal Aid Fund. I surmise that the almost co-incidental similar litigation launched against the BNP by the government's equality quango, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), to persuade the party to change its constitution so as to open its membership to all applicants regardless of their ethnic origin (a demand that BNP chairman Gri££in says he is willing to accept without testing its legality before the courts!) was only instigated to provide "proof" that the government and its agencies are even-handed in the enforcement of anti-discriminatory legislation. Having explored the background to Cameron's question to the Prime Minister, we must ask: Who provided the information on which the question was based? Step forward Michael Gove, shadow Conservative education secretary. We know this because it emerged that two weeks before Cameron put his question to Brown in public to a blaze of publicity the same facts were rehearsed by Gove in a private letter he sent to the government's education secretary Ed Balls. But we must dig deeper. Who provided Gove with the information about the obscure alleged "links" between Islamic schools' owners, the Shakhsiyah Foundation, and the alleged "Islamic extremists" of Hizb-ut-Tahrir? We have two good clues. Firstly, last year Gove was appointed as an honorary patron of the Zionist Federation (ZF). The very discreet announcement in the 28th March 2008 Jewish Chronicle which recorded this appointment also mentioned that the previous month he had been awarded the ZF's 'Jerusalem Prize' "....in honour of his support for Israel's security and well-being" . (No mention was made of the amount of money which comes with this prize. Perhaps no hard cash as granted by the Nobel Foundation, but the certainty of a golden career path.) MICHAEL GOVE, JONATHAN TURNER AND THE ZIONIST FEDERATION Among Gove's senior associates in the ZF is the lawyer Jonathan Turner . He was the person who fronted the Jewish Lobby's voluminous complaint against the BBC's Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen , which was part of the Zionist campaign to bring the BBC to heel. Turner's vendetta against Bowen and the BBC was discussed at some length by Oborne. I cover the topic at a later stage. It is enough to remark here that Turner and his researchers obviously see themselves as avenging career-destroyers in the Zionist war against any critical reporting of Israel. Secondly, the Daily Telegraph of 3rd July 2007, reporting Gove's promotion as shadow education secretary, ended by recording that Gove's wife is one Sarah Vine , who I understand is Jewish and who was at the time of the report -- and may still be -- a leader writer with The Times . Gove was assistant editor and chief leader writer of The Times before his election to the House of Commons in 2005. In 1998 Gove was the first senior journalist of a prestigious mass-circulation newspaper to give substantial and helpful coverage [ The Times, Saturday 29th May 1999, page 20] to Nick Gri££in when he was seeking to displace John Tyndall as the leader of the BNP. That article set a trend throughout the British media, but especially among papers who support the Tory Party and maintain a pro-Israel line. [End Extract] I hope the above extract will tempt you to go to The Occidental Observer web site to read my review in full and, perhaps, to download it and/or print it out (12 A4 pages), for onward circulation to your contacts. Likewise, if you run a web site or a blog, I hope you will consider posting the text along with the URL of TOO. I make these requests not just for reasons of ego, but because most of the Establishment's press and broadcasting media have tried to "deal with" the facts Oborne's film contains by giving it the all-too-familiar Zionist-orchestrated "Silent Treatment". Why wouldn't they? There's so much in the film to make them blush with shame and look downcast with guilt. We must spread the news far and wide about what the the Jewish Lobby and their 'bought-and-paid-for' Shabbas Goyim are up to. Ten and more years ago we had almost no ability to circumvent the Silent Treatment of important news, books, films and events. Since then we have the Internet available to us -- so let's use it. All of you should visit Prof. MacDonald's The Occidental Observer web site regularly. It is well constructed and offers a huge and accumulating archive of information designed to assist people of ethnic European stock, wherever they are on the planet, to oppose the malignant anti-gentile and, in particular, anti-White machinations of Jewry.
His
books such as.....
and..... ......are crucial reading for white-European nationalists of all nations. MacDONALD EXPOSES JEWRY'S CYNICAL STRATEGY I am not any kind of a scientist, but I deduce from Prof. MacDonald's writings that Jewry has evolved an evolutionary/'survival of the fittest' way of behaving and thinking whereby Jews are prone to undermine, belittle and deconstruct the cultures and values of the various civilisations in which, for the time being, they settle so that the indigenous or host community begin to lose confidence in their cultural co-ordinates and, indeed, lose their self-worth and leadership ability, all of which are vital ingredients in the survival of any human civilisation -- or indeed of any individual. Working in tandem with this "Culture of Critique" is Jewry's long-noted propensity to promote among all varieties of non-Jews, but particularly White-European peoples, the concept of multi-racialism, cosmopolitanism and racial inter-breeding so that individual racial, national and cultural identities are lost in the resultant human stew, a process which can rightly be described as a form of genocide. In contrast to this two-pronged strategy against all other peoples, the leaders of Jewry in both their secular and the religious postures impose a totally contrary regime on members of their own tribe. There is a constant cavalcade educational and propaganda events (mostly out of eye and earshot of non-Jews) to promote and exalt Jews, Jewishness, Jewish culture in all is forms and epochs, Jewish identity, identification with Israel, Jewish solidarity, etc., etc. Coupled with this is the relentless pressure applied on every Jew, from his or her mother's breast onwards, through every cultural, educational, societal and political medium -- religious and secular -- never to "marry out" (marry a non-Jew). Jews tribal leaders freely describe racial inter-breeding involving Jews as an act of genocide, of "continuing the work of Hitler". When White-gentiles offer the same kind of remark, they are denounced as the worst kind of "racist". The crucial role which Prof. MacDonald plays, as a courageous academic, is to provide the information which will awaken non-Jewish peoples, particularly the White-Europeans, from their media-induced trance and allow them to see that Jewish ideologies are encouraging them to behave in a self-destructive way -- in a way which is completely opposite to the way in which Jewry is mobilised and directed. This Jewish strategy is deeply cynical; deeply cunning. Only a couple of months ago I heard Prof. Richard Dawkins address Jewish-organised meeting of some 900 people at which he discussed his ideas about Darwin's evolutionary concept with Richard Harding, the Zionist-Jewish editor of The Times. In response to a question from me, Prof. Dawkins felt it necessary to describe the way in which the Jewish Lobby was able to mobilise the governments of the United States and of other "Western" nations to act in Israel's interests as "brilliant". The learned professor did not want to bite the hand that was feeding him on that (and perhaps other) occasions. Let us hope that, as a Briton, he sees the behaviour of organised Jewry or Zionist-Jewry as "brilliant" in the context, say, of the master-criminal Dr. Moriarty in Sherlock Holmes' adventures, or Mayer Lansky in the post-WW2 American Cosa Nostra. Let us hope that he is not allowing himself to be used by Jewish racial-supremicists to construct a 'tweak' of Darwin's theory -- designed to dove-tail with the Biblical "Chosen People" conceit -- whereby Jewish supremacy over the rest of Mankind is somehow validated, if only in the eyes of Jewry and its most fawning Shabbas Goyim, as a demonstration of the "Survival of the Fittest". Let us hope he has enough feeling of affection for his own kind of people to wish them well and desire to see that they survive and thrive and shake off the malignant strategies of aliens wish them ill. In Prof. Dawkins' case, we shall have to wait an see what kind of game he is playing. But in Prof. MacDonald's case, he is an open book, and the book preaches, justifies and provides strategies for the survival of our people.
Martin
Webster, Editor |
